Of course they shouldn't, right? Zoos are suppose to show us compassion towards animals, they are supposed to help educate humans about other animals, and they are suppose to be a great way for us to learn about animals up close and personal. However, not all zoos do this and even if they do, does it make it "right" and/or ethical?
Animals in zoos are there to entertain. We go to zoos not to learn, but to be entertained by watching animals roam around, sleep, and eat. Unfortunately, not all animals used in zoos are given the best conditions and environment. Many animals in zoos are stripped away from their parents in the wild, right from birth. Many animals are also transferred from zoo to zoo for either money or reproduction. These animals grow up in a world different then what they naturally would exist in. In Dale Jamieson's article, "Against Zoos", he gives four reasons as to why individuals might go to zoos and he then debunks them.
Jamieson's Arguments:
1. Amusement- Jamieson explains that the
history of many zoos is to provide amusement to humans. However, he questions
if amusement of humans is enough to keep an animal held in captivity.
What do you think about this argument? Human
amusement is more important than animals held in captivity? Or vice
versa?
2. Education-Jamieson states that many argue that zoos should exist because they
provide education to the public. However, he states that there is little
evidence that zoos actually are successful of informing the public about
animals. He quotes a paper by Stephan Kellert who explained that “zoo-goers are
much less knowledgeable about animals, than backpackers…others who claim an
interest in animals”. He also states that many zoo-goers generally have the
same prejudices again animals (dislike for spiders, but elephants are highly
favorable)
Jamieson also questions, what do zoo-goers really
want to get out of zoos that they can’t get from a book or documentary about
that specific animal its natural habitat?
I really enjoyed reading this article and first read it in an Environmental
Ethics class.
What are your arguments for why zoos should still exist? Are they
substantial enough to keep animals in captivity for the rest of their life?
Sources:
http://faculty.uca.edu/rnovy/Jamieson%20--%20Against%20Zoos.htm
http://www.cereplast.com/are-zoos-cruel-the-pros-and-cons-of-zoos-and-wildlife-parks/
Hi, I think now I have a strong hold over the topic after going through the post. The subject that you have discussed in the post is really amazing; I will surely come back for more information.
ReplyDeleteSorn
www.gofastek.com